Category

Court

Category

Papua New Guinea’s Supreme Court in Port Moresby has ordered the release of 52-year-old Italian citizen, Carlo D’Attanasio after a successful appeal.

The Supreme Court overturned the National Court’s decision, following an appeal by D’Attanasio through his lawyer David Dotaona against the State.

The court found that the original verdict, which convicted D’Attanasio, was unsafe and unsatisfactory.

The State’s Allegations

According to the State, D’Attanasio, a 52-year-old Italian national, was jointly accused with three other Papua New Guineans of knowingly concealing 611 kilograms of cocaine between February 1, 2020, and July 26, 2020. The cocaine was valued at two-hundred-million-kina (K200,000,000).

The State alleged that D’Attanasio and his co-accused, Morgan Mogu, met in 2018 in Milne Bay.

In early 2020, Mogu was told of a “big job” coming up, and in March-April 2020, a yacht would drop off cargo at Kupiano, Central Province. The co-accused allegedly transported the packages to Papa-Lealea in Central Province towards the end of July 2020, to be loaded onto a small plane.

On July 26, 2020, another accomplice, John Cutmore, landed a small plane at a makeshift runway. The plane crashed upon take-off, and the group removed the cocaine packages and hid them in the bush.

The Original Trial and Conviction

At the trial, the State relied on 137 exhibits of tendered evidence, including records of interviews with the four accused. There was no oral testimony, and all accused, including D’Attanasio, remained silent.
After hearing submissions, the trial judge accepted the State’s allegations and convicted the four accused of money laundering.

Grounds for Appeal

The appellant, Carlo D’Attanasio, decided to appeal the National Court’s decision. His grounds of appeal, presented by his lawyer David Dotaona, argued that the trial judge erred in law and fact in two respects:
First, by misinterpreting the elements of the offense, when the state’s allegations, even if sustained, did not support a conviction under section 508B(1) and second, by entering a conviction in the absence of sufficient admissible evidence, specifically that:

  1. The State’s case was based entirely on tendered evidence without oral testimony.
  2. Reliance was placed on uncorroborated evidence from a sniffer dog’s search of D’Attanasio’s yacht.
  3. The trial judge misapplied the principles of circumstantial evidence by not assisting a reasonable and innocent explanation of evidence tending to implicate D’Attanasio in his record of interview, and
  4. Evidence from co-accused was used against the appellant, contrary to the principles of accomplice evidence.

Key Evidence and Timeline

According to the determination of the appeal, D’Attanasio admitted to sailing his yacht, MV Badu, from South America.

According to records, D’Attanasio sailed to the Royal Papua Yacht Club marina on March 26, 2020. Due to COVID-19 protocols, he was told to anchor in isolation for 14-days.

MV Badu will now be returning home after Owner, Carlo D.Attanasio was freed by PNG Supreme court
MV Badu

Between April 9 and 14, 2020, D’Attanasio made repeated requests to come ashore via radio. He completed documentation at the Royal Papua Yacht Club mid April 2020, and the yacht was cleared by Customs on April 20, 2020.

Due to COVID-19 protocols, Customs did not search the yacht.

D’Attanasio’s passport had expired on March 7, 2020.

In early July 2020, D’Attanasio informed the Royal Papua Yacht Club that he intended to go to Alotau.
On July 26, 2020, the plane piloted by John Cutmore crashed at Papa-Lealea.

On 27th of July, 2020, Cutmore surrendered himself to the Australian High Commission, and was interviewed by Police on July 30, 2020.

Also on July 30, 2020, D’Attanasio’s co-accused were arrested, and 28 bags of cocaine located in the bush. That same day, D’Attanasio sought clearance to depart for Bali on August 1, 2020. Clearance was issued on the morning of August 1, but the vessel did not depart.

On August 3 and 4, 2020, a search of the MV Badu by police and customs, with assistance from a sniffer dog, indicated four areas of interest within the yacht. A small quantity of cocaine, 50 grams, was found in a plastic bag. However, no comparison was made between this cocaine and the 28 bags found at Papa-Lealea.

Supreme Court’s Decision

The Supreme Court determined that this was a “borderline case” due to the unclear disputed facts. The court found that while the circumstances were suspicious, the evidence was not strong enough to exclude a rational inference other than D’Attanasio’s guilt.

The three-man bench, comprising Justice David Cannings, Peter Toliken, and Teresa Berrigan, ruled that the conviction of the 52-year-old Italian citizen by the National Court was unsafe and unsatisfactory.

The court ordered that D’Attanasio’s appeal be allowed, the conviction quashed, and a verdict of not guilty substituted.

The decision was handed down in Waigani, National Capital District, on Thursday, July 31, 2025.

The now-free Carlo D’Attanasio, who is currently hospitalized with colorectal cancer, thanked his lawyer, David Dotaona, and expressed faith in PNG’s justice system. He is in close communication with the Italian Embassy to arrange his return home.


The Campaign Manager for advocacy group Act Now! appeared at the Waigani Committal Court on Tuesday (January 21) for Identity Theft.

Eddie Tanago, 40, from Northern Province appeared for his first mention before Magistrate, Carthleen Sopa.

As is the initial process for the Committal Court, Mr Tanago was read out his charges and rights.

According to police, on the 27th of December 2024, Tanago had “intentionally and without lawful excuse used an electric system, a Facebook account, namely Act Now! to use the identification of another person, Mr John Mosoro, the Managing Director for the PNG Forest Authority without his authorization.”

This action contravened section 15, subparagraph (b) of the PNG Cybercrime Act 2016.

A statement released by the PNG Forest Authority on the 12th of December 2024, following Tanago’s arrest on the 11th of December 2024, said the arrest is for posting defamatory remarks on the 27th of November 2024, against the PNG Forest Authority Managing Director, John Mosoro.

The Statement said, Tanago was “questioned on his actions in sharing a certain advertisement on social media.”

The advert carried a “face photo” (mugshot) of the PNG Forest Authority boss.

The advert was initially created by FM100 Talk Back Show to promote the appearance of the PNG Forest Authority Team.

Tanago and his organization, Act Now, reused the advertisement on their Facebook page to promote a blog on their website criticizing the PNG Forest Authority’s content on the show.

An act that has now landed the organization in court for using Mosoro’s picture without his consent.

Lawyer representing Tanago however pointed out to the court that the police files he obtained has the charges against Section 21, subsection 2 of the Cybercrime Act which is for Defamatory Publications.

Magistrate Sopa, however clarified that what she read out was the police files that were handed to her.

She proceeded with the proceedings under Identity Theft and adjourned the matter to the 25th of February for the next mention.

Section 15 of the Cybercrime Act is titled “Identity Theft”.

The charge is for “a person who intentionally and without lawful excuse or justification, or in excess of a lawful excuse or justification, uses an electronic system or device to either a) to access, (b) to manipulate, (c) to posses, (d) to use, or (e) to transfer a means of identification of another person without authorization of that other person.”


Convicted lawyer Paul Paraka, has been sentenced to 20 years imprisonment based on the Principle of Totality.

The Waigani National Court ordered a 10 year jail term for Paraka on each of the five counts he was convicted for.

However, Justice Teresa Berrigan applied the Principle of Totality, and sentenced the 54-year-old to serve 20 years behind bars.

“The Principle of Totality requires a judge who is sentencing an offender on a number of offences, to ensure that the totality or agrivated sentence of the appropriate sentences for each sentence is just and appropriate for the totality of the criminality,” said Justice Berrigan.

Paraka, the principle lawyer of the Paul Paraka Law firm, was found guilty by the Waigani National Court on five counts of misappropriating of state monies totaling K165 million.

The National Court found that between 2007 and 2011, Paraka procured a person or persons within the Department of Finance to dishonestly apply monies to his own use and the use of others.

This was done through 65 cheques over a period of five years starting in;

  • 2007- K30, 300 000, million
  • 2008 K30, 054 312.68 million
  • 2009 K14, 480 672 million
  • 2010, K39, 808 610 million
  • 2011 – K47, 608 300 million.

That money was never recovered.

During the trial, the State submitted that each of the offence was unprecedented in size in the history of Papua New Guinea and submitted that the maximum penalty must be given.

The state argued that the offence was perpetrated over a period of five years and not a spur of the moment.

It was highly a complete scheme demonstrating careful planning as seen in the number of years through the use of law firms in the pretext of court orders (OS 876/2006) in which the offender was a party and transferer of monies to the accused’s law firm and company accounts.

In Paraka’s submissions, he argued that the verdict on conviction was wrong and a sentence cannot be passed.

Paul Paraka had submitted that Justice Berrigan hold her decision on the sentence and allow him to appeal the verdict at the Supreme Court.

He further submitted that the sentence be wholly suspended due to his heart problems and said he could have lost his life through this case. Paraka added that his doctor says he is at risk of heart attack.

However when considering the submissions, Justice Berrigan rejected Paraka’s submission that sentences should not be passed.

“He is entitled to maintain that the verdict is wrong, but for reasons previously given, the right place for those contentions is before the Supreme Court,” said Justice Berrigan.

She continued her judgement saying, it is her view that the courts must strongly condem dishonest offences by lawyers.

Berrigan said it was an elaborated scheme conducted by multiple transactions and the use of the offender’s own property investment company and other multiple law firms through which the payments were funnelled for each of the five consecutive years the offence took place.

The judge said it (offence) demonstrated careful planning and a calculated design to avoid detection and distance the offender from the monies.

“It must also be recognized that a offence of such scale against public finds have the potential to tarnish Papua New Guinea standing at the international level, “said Berrigan.

After careful consideration from submissions from both the state and the defense, Justice Berrigan ruled that Paraka be sentenced to 20 years in prison and will serve his time at the Bomana Correctional Service.

Recent: https://insidepng.com/justice-purdon-sully-sworn-in/

The National and Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea has welcomed a new judge through a swearing-in ceremony at the Government House in Port Moresby.

Justice Susan Purdon-Sully from Brisbane, Australia has been appointed for a term of 3 years by the Judicial and Legal Services Commission.

Purdon-Sully is one of three expatriate judges who were appointed in June.
Prior to her appointment Justice Purdon-Sully was a Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court in Australia and has a vast experience in family court.

At her swearing-in ceremony today, Purdon-Sully recited the Declaration of Office and Declaration of Loyalty and Judicial Declaration before the Governor General, Grand Chief Sir Bob Dadae.

The ceremony was witnessed by Minister for Justice & Attorney General and Chairman of the Judicial & Legal Services Commission, Pila Niningi and acting Chief Justice Les Gavara-Nanu.

A total of six judges were appointed in June, two of them were acting judges.

Purdon-Sully

The Lawyer representing the wife of the late Sam Basil in a case has called on the media to be properly informed before reporting on court matters.

Felix Waingi of the Albright Lawyers in Lae made this statement following a newspaper article published on the 20th of September regarding the arrest of Shalatee Dong Basil, wife of the late MP, Sam Basil.

On the 9th of September, the accused appeared before the Lae District Court for mention of alleged offences of breaking in and stealing. Waingi who is Mrs Basil’s lawyer said the article had the wrong name of the magistrate that presided over the case on the 9th.

Waingi said the article mentioned Magistrate Lorna Sani when it was Senior Provincial Magistrate Pius Tapil who presided over the case. He added, the reporter based the report on a police-hand-up brief, which he says was not yet ready before the court.

Mr Waingi further added the public depends on the media for accurate and appropriate information to report on issues happening in the country.

“We can’t have the media reporting biased and misinformation because the public consumes the information as their gospel truth,” Waingi said.

He said for a country like PNG, the public views allegations reported by the mainstream media as facts, whereas social media is used to make defamatory conclusions against the accused.

“I urged the mainstream media to be independent and report responsibly with the appropriate and right information so everyone is well informed,” Waingi said.

Meanwhile, Mrs Basil will appear for her committal hearing on the 4th of November. She is currently out on a K5000 bail with conditions.

Pin It